Neil Barker <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> verbally sodomised in
news:MPG.2005a8d3300f9221989a8e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <66ed0$459b6669$3e18e6cb$16027@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> richard.news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> Mark Dunn wrote:
>> > To Mr. Barker.
>> > "Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > news:MPG.2003a733a4d6a30d989a8d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> In article <0MidnX2VapmN7wTYnZ2dnUVZ8s-qnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> markrhdunn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >>> It's a bit wordy but certainly not bad enough to warant such
>> >>> language.
>> >> To whom are you addressing that comment ?
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Neil Barker
>>
>> Have you not seen this guy's incessant newsgroup spam promoting his
>> complete dogpile of a site?
>
> Quite - hence my choice of words, which I totally stand by.
>
Like, totally.
--
Phil Kyle™
T
h i
i s
s l
f i l
S o n o
i u e n
g r s g
