Re: Image recovery: Recovering fragmented image files from flash

Phil Carmody wrote:

> Each of the above operations is atomic, so what the **** is a write 
> pointer? You're barely making sense, so it's hard to argue against 
> you.

You have read about FSInfo.FSI_Nxt_Free?

Isn't that a write pointer?


> The FAT32 system apparently (see posts by other posters upthread)
> writes each new file at the lowest cluster it can.

So you think that the system scans the FAT, each time a cluster has to 
be allocated to an file or directory?

> This is in agreement with all the prior FAT 
> systems that I have been familiar with.

Then familiarize with the new features of FAT32, before posting nonsense
;-]

DoDi