In message <SxmKj.28814$dT.24123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jim
<jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>
>"Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:MPG.22632a1b22b30553989b5b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <T0ZJj.28118$dT.12586@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> says...
>>>
>>> "Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:MPG.225fda68daea7fa989b56@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> > And you never offered to pay, either.
>>>
>>> PAY FOR WHAT!? YOU STILL HAVEN'T PRODUCED A DAMNED THING!
>>
>> You have a bad attitude problem Jim, you really do.
>>
>> You didn't explain yourself at all well in your initial post and
>> everyone here took it as meaning you were expecting them free. Perhaps
>> that should tell you something.
>
>Actually it does. it tells me that that is the behavior that you have
come
>to expect from people - even when that is not what is said.
Yes it is normal English comprehension. I suggest you learn it. Note
the same thing was assumed from people BOTH sides of the Atlantic. SO we
can assume what you wrote seemed clear to the majority of English
speakers/readers. That you were looking for Free photos. You were
certainly asking for links to photos.
>That tells me that most people that have sought photos through you in the
>past were looking for free photos.
Not at all... It's just those who phrased it they way you did were
looking for Free photos. Many people ask for photos, both paid for and
free.
>That tells me that people (in general) do not value good photography.
Then you have absolutely no comprehension of this NG at all! Clearly you
have not read, or at least understood the replies to you.
It seems your comprehension of English is again at fault. Are you a
native English speaker?
>What it does not tell me is why I was lumped in with those assholes base
>purely on assumptions by posters in these ngs.
AFAICS You were lumped in with them for several reasons
1 Your initial post implied you were looking for free pictures. That was
how it was read by native English speakers/readers from both sides of
the Atlantic You certainly asked for links to photos and asked to see
photos but there was no suggestion you were looking to buy any.
2 Your attitude (of being an arse hole) in your replies to some
constructive criticism designed to help. May people who offered
constrictive criticism would have helped and probably found the pictures
you wanted (or gone and taken them).
3 Your continual arguing that you are the only one who is right and all
those who offered constructive criticism and would have offered pictures
(had you not behaved as such an arse hole) are all wrong.
Net result is that in the photography NG's you have cross posted to you
are seen as an arrogant arse hole that no one is likely to help.
Had you taken the advice you were given earlier in this thread and
behaved politely by now I am sure you would have had all the photos you
needed. You appear to be the looser in all this any yet you continue to
dig the hole deeper.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
|
