Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Photography > Re: Canon EOS 4...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 25 of 59 Topic 11199 of 12303
Post > Topic >>

Re: Canon EOS 40D

by "SteveB" <oldfart@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 1, 2008 at 10:20 AM

"Joel" <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:anj6q39b92hp8qbt2gle98642tjsu0ls9k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "SteveB" <oldfart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Joel" <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>
>> >> Steve, who finds Google hard to use.
>> >
>> > May I suggest you to learn to take advantage of Google? or it's hard
>> > because you never spent time to learn to take advantage of it, and
some 
>> > of
>> > us find easy after spending times learning how to use it.
>>
>> I had a traumatic brain injury nearly four years ago, and get lost and
>> overloaded at times.  I'm smart, but it doesn't stay with me for long. 
I
>> also find that there are so many hits you get that are only remotely
>> associated with what you're actually looking for.  And then there's all

>> the
>> sifting through information.  It's very difficult at times.
>>
>> Steve
>
> Me?
>
> - Twenty some years ago I got so many health problem that I had to
retired
> early in my late 40's.  And it took me 4-5 years to be able to learn to 
> walk
> again, and still depend on many medicines to stay alive these days.  But

> it
> has been much better.
>
> - During the illness, I have quite a bit of memory loss.  PLUS English 
> isn't
> my native language so it's a BONUS to my problem.  But that doesn't give

> me
> any good excuse to continue to take advantage of Internet to learn from
> millions of people around the world.  And thing is getting even harder
at
> the age of 71... but I'm still not giving up learning.
>
> - The links some of us have posted here once awhile would give you much 
> more
> information than you would like to know, and it may take an average
person
> 4-6 months worth of reading.  And the benefit of reading thing you don't
> look for is a bonus (at least to me), and that's one of many reasons why
I
> enjoy Google.
>
> - Because most thing won't change overnight, so it's a good thing to
read
> the old questions already been answered (including some debates) without
> having to ask the same question to get the same answer.  This is the 
> reason
> why I hardly ask any question, or because I always try to find the
answer
> first before asking the same quesion.

Good for you!

Steve
 




 59 Posts in Topic:
Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-01-31 19:59:38 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-01 03:17:09 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-01 06:19:14 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Colin_D <nospam@[EMAIL  2008-02-01 23:46:44 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-01 10:40:44 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-01 20:29:56 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-02 20:15:46 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Colin_D <nospam@[EMAIL  2008-02-02 14:29:30 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-02 20:14:14 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-02 21:25:10 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-03 09:52:21 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-03 16:32:07 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"OG" <owen@[  2008-02-02 19:08:26 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <n  2008-02-01 09:12:08 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-02 06:09:10 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-02 05:45:20 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <n  2008-02-04 13:15:05 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <n  2008-02-04 13:14:39 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
suddengunfire <dariusd  2008-02-01 02:50:51 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <n  2008-02-04 13:18:10 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <s  2008-03-08 13:28:38 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-01-31 21:52:41 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-02-01 01:44:14 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-01 11:09:10 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-02-01 10:20:49 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-01 12:10:51 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
plb49 <paul.busse@[EMA  2008-02-01 07:34:49 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-01-31 23:20:04 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-01 07:59:10 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-02-01 01:46:13 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Dave Cohen <user@[EMAI  2008-02-01 17:35:46 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-01 18:18:14 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-01 18:33:25 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-01 19:30:33 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-02-01 10:26:11 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-01 12:26:58 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-01 14:55:13 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-02 01:30:31 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-02-01 22:14:10 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-02 06:25:43 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-02 06:04:37 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <ol  2008-02-02 09:24:30 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-02 09:35:49 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-02 21:30:46 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-03 09:55:43 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-03 14:05:47 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-01 12:01:17 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"DaveS" <3cr  2008-02-02 16:55:29 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-02 18:09:44 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Jay" <smtp@  2008-02-03 19:31:20 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-03 16:24:39 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <n  2008-02-04 13:19:22 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-04 20:29:25 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-04 17:00:15 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"The One" <n  2008-02-04 13:24:43 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
Nospam <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-02-03 21:52:41 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-03 17:29:33 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-04 01:25:04 
Re: Canon EOS 40D
"Rob Bradford"   2008-02-06 14:40:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Tue Jan 6 19:54:28 PST 2009.