Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Photography > Re: CMOS
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 14 Topic 11213 of 12303
Post > Topic >>

Re: CMOS

by Paul Furman <paul-@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 4, 2008 at 10:48 PM

SteveB wrote:
> I'm hearing a lot about CMOS sizes.  Any short explanation as it refers
to 
> photography would be appreciated, especially why a camera with CMOS is 
> better than one without.  And is bigger better?
> 
> I Googled it, and understand that it is a low power use applied to
cameras 
> and electronic equipment, but it didn't go into photography much.

CMOS vs CCD sensor; the CMOS has more stuff between the pixels for 
processing, doing tricks on the sensor... something like that... maybe 
gives you a clue what to look for at least. CMOS is generally considered 
better for low noise because of the extra tricks. Apologies for being 
wishy washy but I think that's the gist.
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
CMOS
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-04 20:36:57 
Re: CMOS
"Michael J. Astrausk  2008-02-05 05:24:35 
Re: CMOS
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-05 07:17:39 
Re: CMOS
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-05 09:26:51 
Re: CMOS
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-04 22:48:08 
Re: CMOS
"Celcius" <c  2008-02-05 07:06:12 
Re: CMOS
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-05 08:38:48 
Re: CMOS
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-05 11:18:13 
Re: CMOS
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-05 21:20:48 
Re: CMOS
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-05 13:53:56 
Re: CMOS
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-02-05 13:02:15 
Re: CMOS
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-05 21:10:49 
Re: CMOS
"Celcius" <c  2008-02-05 17:35:40 
Re: CMOS
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-05 09:23:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 5:00:10 PST 2009.