Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Photography > Re: OT, but OT
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 11216 of 12303
Post > Topic >>

Re: OT, but OT

by "Rudy Benner" <total@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 5, 2008 at 03:08 PM

"DaveS" <3crows@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:13qh7q83c1vceaa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "SteveB" <deserttraveler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> (off topic, but on)
>>
>> I need to scan some photos and convert them to dxf files.  I have been 
>> steered to Corel Draw 12.  I want to enter them into a CNC robotic
plasma 
>> cutter, and that needs a dxf file that it can convert.  Has anyone had 
>> any experience with this, or Corel Draw 12?
>
> I don't think you can get where you need to be from photos.  DXF is
vector 
> based, and photos are raster, or like raster.  I usually trace over
photos 
> in AutoCAD for things like that, then scale to match a real world 
> dimension on the part.  That's a very innacurate way to work though. 
You 
> really need the part in front of you where you can measure it and draw
it 
> accurately.
>
> Have fun,
> dave
>

Try this :

http://www.rastervect.com/home.htm

Lots of hits in Google if you enter 'Raster to Vector"
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
OT, but OT
"SteveB" <de  2008-02-05 10:09:25 
Re: OT, but OT
"DaveS" <3cr  2008-02-05 12:39:19 
Re: OT, but OT
"Rudy Benner" &  2008-02-05 15:08:32 
Re: OT, but OT
dj_nme <dj_nme@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 19:14:07 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 4:49:24 PST 2009.