Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Another cas...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 64 Topic 11229 of 12184
Post > Topic >>

Re: Another casualty on the digital highway

by "Ric Trexell" <rictrexell@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 8, 2008 at 11:01 PM

"Elmore" <el@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Kd-dnc0VFNfEkjDanZ2dnUVZ_t6onZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Polaroid to Close Last Remaining Film Plants.  There were some things I
> wanted to try with Polaroid film, but never got around to doing.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
>
> In its heyday, Polaroid employed some 15,000 people in the state. The
> company filed for bankruptcy in 2001 as the advent of digital
> technology dampened demand for instant photography.
********************************************************************
Polaroid was Polaroids worst enemy, not digital photography.  Their whole
system was messed up from the start.  They would develop a great process,
improve it and then drop it.  When they had the pack cameras (peel apart
film) they came out with basically the same camera year after year.  The
first was the 100, then 200, the 360 introduced electronic flash.  You
would
think they would have that on the 400 series but no, they came out with a
flash cube flash.  They went backwards.  When the SX-70 came out they
never
really introduced any variations of it, but when they came out with the
600
series, the film would not work in the old SX-70's.  So eventually those
that had SX-70's were out of luck for film.  Their history has shown a
company that could never settle down with one format and stay with it. 
The
whole idea with them was to get you to buy a new Polaroid every three
years.
People that wanted an instant film camera for sales or to do***ent things
soon found out they might as well use regular film cameras and go to a
quick
development lab.  Fuji will probably make some instant films for the time
being, but who knows for how long.  Had Polaroid improved some of their
better cameras like the 180 and 195, they might have been taken seriously.
Eventually people like me that were sup****ters of the Polaroid system felt
we were using toy cameras and lost interest in them.  For some things,
they
were more conveinient than digital, but they are history now.  Ric in
Wisconsin.
 




 64 Posts in Topic:
Another casualty on the digital highway
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-08 20:26:16 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Ric Trexell" &  2008-02-08 23:01:28 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-09 09:57:40 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-10 03:40:48 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
dj_nme <dj_nme@[EMAIL   2008-02-10 17:32:20 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
tony cooper <tony_coop  2008-02-10 09:32:27 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-10 09:18:14 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-11 00:56:10 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-02-11 17:18:56 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-12 18:31:57 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-10 06:59:36 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-10 06:16:38 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-09 08:00:56 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-09 11:31:24 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-02-10 16:38:23 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-12 18:48:56 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-12 20:58:24 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Michael <adunc79617@[E  2008-02-13 00:59:34 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-13 10:53:22 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"RecyclerMan (Robert  2008-02-14 07:32:06 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-14 01:56:18 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-13 19:34:08 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-13 22:32:21 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-14 08:40:57 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-14 12:30:09 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-14 14:05:41 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-15 20:02:59 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-13 21:16:05 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-13 22:14:07 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-13 23:52:32 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-14 12:51:40 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-14 10:59:59 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
dj_nme <dj_nme@[EMAIL   2008-02-15 11:23:23 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-15 05:47:32 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
dj_nme <dj_nme@[EMAIL   2008-02-16 04:08:18 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-13 10:38:18 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-13 10:37:21 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-14 19:39:10 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-15 10:11:26 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-16 03:44:01 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-16 06:07:28 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-16 17:03:59 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Elmore" <el  2008-02-16 13:06:37 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-02-16 20:20:19 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-16 13:51:25 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Peter" <pet  2008-02-16 19:59:33 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-16 11:16:01 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-18 01:37:01 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-15 20:17:31 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-15 13:03:53 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-14 19:42:08 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-17 16:35:02 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-18 09:17:41 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-17 16:36:50 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-18 02:10:54 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-18 02:54:49 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-18 20:01:08 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-18 16:21:03 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-18 17:29:30 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-18 16:41:11 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-18 18:32:29 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"Mr. Strat" <  2008-02-19 08:37:07 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
"McKev \(yay!\)"  2008-02-21 17:56:48 
Re: Another casualty on the digital highway
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-02-24 02:35:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Nov 18 17:56:36 CST 2008.