Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking clear video/stills of UFO's?

Waiving the right to remain silent, Doc <docsavage20@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> On Feb 19, 8:35ÿpm, "Larry L [in Honolulu]" <la...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Actually no one I know with good video or even still equipment keeps it
>> ready, unprotected, and sitting on his car seat, as that would be an
>> invitation to have it stolen. My gear is always in a case, at best in
>> the trunk, and if I saw a UFO I'd have to consider the time I'd spend
>> not looking at it in order to get the camera out and ready. Considering
>> that most of these events don't last too long, that might be a tough
>> call. 
> 
> 
> I was thinking of gear kept in a house too, but anyway.
> 
> I hear the points you're making, but it just seems that by sheer
> numbers, over the years - the cir***stance of an event and someone
> with gear ready would converge. Someone already doing a shoot at the
> beach or other outdoor cir***stances, someone videotaping from their
> balcony, rooftop, wherever, you would think that by now someone would
> have gotten a good shot of one of these "unexplained" objects, showing
> it to be either a recognizeable craft or object or not.

It's catch-22 in a manner of speaking.

If someone gets a shot of a recognizable craft, it would by definition be
an IFO, not a UFO, and therefore not newsworthy and not interesting. 

In reality there are thousands, perhaps millions of shots of exactly what
the original poster is asking for - an IFO. 

See how that works..?

-- 
  Larry Jandro
  Video Engineering & Equipment Rentals
  Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
   [Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to reply]