Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking clear video/stills of UFO's?

"Doc" <docsavage20@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:7bd26cfc-ead8-412c-985a-a3e81e1be330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Feb 20, 2:52 am, "Dudley Hanks" <hanks.dud...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Having spent a lot of time taking shots in low-light conditions -- rock
> concerts, nightscapes, astronomical, etc -- I can vouch that it is not 
> easy
> to get a good, crisp and clear object of something that is right in
front 
> of
> you let alone 35,000 feet above.


Many of these events happen during the day too.

Here's another way to ask the question. How difficult would it be to
get a clear shot of an airliner or a launching space shuttle during
the day - what would it take? By clear, I don't necessarily mean being
able to see the kid in the 8th row back picking his nose, but where
you can distinctly make out the form of the craft.

What about one of a manned balloon that's hovering at high altitude?
Totally different level of difficulty?

But, as was stated in my earlier post, if these incidents truly are
evidence 
of visitation from other worlds, then we are dealing with a rather
dramatic 
difference in technological capability.  With this difference in mind,
there 
is no certainty that our level of photographic ability would be sufficient

to catch an image of futuristic crafts floating in some kind of time /
space 
netherland.

The eye can see dynamic ranges that currently cannot be captured in its 
entirety by current films and sensors.  There is nothing to say that 
materials from other planets / solar systems will not reflect light or 
generate some sort of visible image that cannot be reproduced accurately
on 
film / memory device.  Hence, bad pics.

Trying to keep my mind open,
Dudley