Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Serious que...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 39 of 66 Topic 11277 of 12184
Post > Topic >>

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking clear video/stills of UFO's?

by "Anon" <abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 20, 2008 at 10:46 PM

"SteveB" <morphonym@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:jg2u85-8ik2.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Ken Hart" <kwhart1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:fpgcf8$4jl$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "SteveB" <morphonym@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:a7hs85-tl41.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Trouble is, mine times out, and if I don't take a picture in some 
>>> specified time, it shuts off automatically. Now, you have to catch
that, 
>>> and reset, unless your camera like mine will stay on continuously if
it 
>>> is on its AC power supply.
>>>
>>
>> Camera times out and shuts off? How does that work? I've never had that

>> happen with any of my cameras. They don't even have an AC power supply.
>
> It's pretty simple.  There's a timer in there so that if you forget to 
> turn off your camera and don't take a picture for x amount of minutes,
it 
> shuts the power off.  Particularly useful when you leave the LCD screen 
> on, and it's using battery power by the handful.
>
> What's so hard to understand about that?  Just because your camera
doesn't 
> have this feature does not mean it is not available.  Maybe it's only 
> available on the better cameras.
>
> Steve

Only P&S and bridge cameras do this. SLRs and DSLR don't. Although, having

said that, most DSLRs go into a power save mode after a while, but a
simple 
press on a button wakes them up instantly. Cameras that use an LCD for 
composing tend to switch off completely requiring a full power on cycle 
again (and in the case of the cheaper cameras, requiring your to reset the

zoom and focus).
 




 66 Posts in Topic:
Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-19 14:41:22 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"nappy" <n@[  2008-02-19 14:46:58 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
dlzc <dlzc1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 15:24:23 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-19 22:56:55 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-19 15:43:11 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-19 22:05:18 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com   2008-02-20 06:04:57 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 12:27:25 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"David McCall"   2008-02-20 21:53:44 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 16:56:15 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <me  2008-02-20 20:17:23 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com   2008-02-20 20:28:28 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-21 21:42:26 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-22 07:12:33 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-21 23:32:13 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Rick Merrill <rick0.me  2008-02-22 11:21:39 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <me  2008-02-22 09:54:18 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-22 20:03:15 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <me  2008-02-22 15:48:32 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-22 17:46:10 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Rick Merrill <rick0.me  2008-02-23 11:34:23 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-22 19:18:03 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[  2008-02-19 23:51:09 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Androcles" <  2008-02-19 23:55:14 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
TRoss <tross003@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 18:14:47 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Larry L [in Honolul  2008-02-20 01:35:57 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"David McCall"   2008-02-20 01:45:19 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-19 22:12:41 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-19 18:54:43 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
ushere <removethis.les  2008-02-20 03:22:02 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[  2008-02-20 09:42:34 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <mo  2008-02-19 19:52:01 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 00:04:57 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 07:30:31 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-19 23:55:25 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <mo  2008-02-20 09:53:15 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 12:16:16 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-20 12:21:07 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Anon" <abus  2008-02-20 22:46:58 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 23:11:44 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Anon" <abus  2008-02-21 00:03:02 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 20:04:07 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 19:58:42 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-19 22:53:00 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[  2008-02-20 09:48:48 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Bill <trash@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-20 12:04:31 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 20:18:37 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 12:46:44 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-02-20 15:58:36 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 21:19:21 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 13:29:10 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 22:15:50 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 16:35:58 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-20 20:29:40 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-20 20:26:28 
Re: UFO Photography and Videography (was: from a skeptic)
"William Graham"  2008-02-19 22:09:39 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 07:52:03 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Martin Heffels <goofie  2008-02-20 15:19:00 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 08:44:03 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 08:55:40 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 20:08:25 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-02-20 19:02:16 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"john bates" &l  2008-02-21 19:16:04 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 21:04:38 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 21:09:10 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
dlzc <dlzc1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-26 11:49:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 7:05:55 CST 2008.