Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Serious que...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 54 of 66 Topic 11277 of 11963
Post > Topic >>

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking

by Pudentame <no.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 20, 2008 at 08:29 PM

Bill wrote:
> You know, if the Air Force really did want to keep some of their 
> exercises a secret, why wouldn't they just say, "Golly, yes, I guess you

> must have seen a UFO..." and leave it at that.
> 
> It seems odd when they sometimes say there was no UFO.  It is 
> understandable that they would say "it wasn't us", but how could they 
> possibly know for sure it wasn't somebody else?  Everybody stay calm.
> 
> 
> 

Wheels within wheels & misdirection. They got ya lookin' for alien 
bodies at Roswell while they play around with their new stuff somewhere 
else.

Ever read _The Purloined Letter_?


> Larry in AZ wrote:
>> Waiving the right to remain silent, Pudentame <no.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> said:
>>
>>
>>> But, IIRC, the USMC later admitted they were conducting training west 
>>> of San Diego that night. There were some pointed comments made about 
>>> why the military would first deny having aircraft in the area then 
>>> later admit they were operating there. They claimed it was all a 
>>> mis-understanding.
>>
>>
>> It probably *was* a misunderstanding.  There is not one solitary 
>> individual answering questions about all military operations.
>>
>> When the question was first asked of some overworked second lieutenant 
>> on IO duty that night, he may have known nothing about it, and 
>> answered, "Wasn't us."
>>
>> At some later point, the question got to the Colonel who did know 
>> about it, and decided that telling wouldn't compromise anything.
>>
 




 66 Posts in Topic:
Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-19 14:41:22 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"nappy" <n@[  2008-02-19 14:46:58 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
dlzc <dlzc1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 15:24:23 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-19 22:56:55 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-19 15:43:11 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-19 22:05:18 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com   2008-02-20 06:04:57 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 12:27:25 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"David McCall"   2008-02-20 21:53:44 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 16:56:15 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <me  2008-02-20 20:17:23 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com   2008-02-20 20:28:28 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-21 21:42:26 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-22 07:12:33 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-21 23:32:13 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Rick Merrill <rick0.me  2008-02-22 11:21:39 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <me  2008-02-22 09:54:18 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-22 20:03:15 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <me  2008-02-22 15:48:32 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-22 17:46:10 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Rick Merrill <rick0.me  2008-02-23 11:34:23 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-22 19:18:03 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[  2008-02-19 23:51:09 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Androcles" <  2008-02-19 23:55:14 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
TRoss <tross003@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 18:14:47 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Larry L [in Honolul  2008-02-20 01:35:57 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"David McCall"   2008-02-20 01:45:19 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-19 22:12:41 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-19 18:54:43 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
ushere <removethis.les  2008-02-20 03:22:02 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[  2008-02-20 09:42:34 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <mo  2008-02-19 19:52:01 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 00:04:57 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 07:30:31 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-02-19 23:55:25 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"SteveB" <mo  2008-02-20 09:53:15 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 12:16:16 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-20 12:21:07 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Anon" <abus  2008-02-20 22:46:58 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 23:11:44 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Anon" <abus  2008-02-21 00:03:02 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 20:04:07 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Ken Hart" <  2008-02-20 19:58:42 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-19 22:53:00 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Larry in AZ <usenet2@[  2008-02-20 09:48:48 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Bill <trash@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-20 12:04:31 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 20:18:37 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 12:46:44 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-02-20 15:58:36 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 21:19:21 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 13:29:10 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 22:15:50 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"William Graham"  2008-02-20 16:35:58 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-20 20:29:40 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-02-20 20:26:28 
Re: UFO Photography and Videography (was: from a skeptic)
"William Graham"  2008-02-19 22:09:39 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 07:52:03 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Martin Heffels <goofie  2008-02-20 15:19:00 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 08:44:03 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 08:55:40 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-02-20 20:08:25 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-02-20 19:02:16 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
"john bates" &l  2008-02-21 19:16:04 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 21:04:38 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI  2008-02-20 21:09:10 
Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak
dlzc <dlzc1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-26 11:49:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Sep 6 0:51:38 CDT 2008.