Re: Another casualty on the digital highway

"Mr. Strat" <rag@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:190220080837071550%rag@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article
> <545acee9-9d0c-4f4b-a921-891c475d8608@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think so.  It's your general lack of grasp
>> of ALL matters to do with modern film that is lacking.
>> Not just amateur.
>
> Uh-huh.
>
>> Almost all remaining film users, amateur or not, have converted
>> to scanning and downstream digital workflow. Nowadays,
>> virtually the only difference between digital and film is the sensor
>> itself. Only some old folks insist on the old chestnuts of "dirty"
>> grain and other such utter rubbish.

Excuse me...Im very conversant with digital and I also use film - I find
my 
enjoyment of film has increased in recent years because more people just 
depend upon a digital camera to do all the work when the shutter is
pressed.

Film is fab.

Grain is great.

and youre a tit.

McKev