ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:13:37 -0600, Joel wrote:
>
> > ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:09:39 +1100, Rock wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'm looking for a good small pocket camera, (not the SLR
style)which
> >> > will take good crisp reasonably hi resolution stage shots of shows.
> >> >
> >> > Naturally good ****trait shots as well.
> >> >
> >> > Another concern is battery charging (I like the usb + power idea)
> >> > good size storage card to hold a few hi res shots)
> >> >
> >> > I am in Sydney Australia so will buy here or going to
> >> > Singa****e,Europe,US soon so maybe buy there if much cheaper than
> >> > Sydney.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the help
> >> >
> >> > rock
> >>
> >> You might also want to check copyright laws since it is illegal to
> >> photgraph many stage performances.
> >
> > There may be some kind of rule, permission, guideline etc. but
> there
> > shouldn't be no LAW to be illegal. Example
> >
> > - Rule or Guideline - no flash to some s****t which may cause problem
to
> > players (like baseball, tennis etc.), fighters (like martial arts)
> >
> > - Permission - no running around during performance, no professional
> > equipment.
> >
> > Other than that there should be no law to be illegal. Or it
> depends on
> > the one who runs the show, not by LAW.
>
> All right - I guess we have a matter of semantics. For example, a
> publi****ng house can legally prohibit photos during presentation of any
> plays for which they provide performance contracts.
That is possible, just like I can prohibit people not just to photograph
inside my house but to step inside my house. But that is privacy not law.
|
