Photography > Photography > Re: Serious que...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking clear video/stills of UFO's?

by "Dudley Hanks" <hanks.dudley@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 22, 2008 at 07:12 AM

>>> But realistically, if you are going to bother to even
>>> consider (and discuss) any problem, then you must consider the laws of

>>> physics as we know
>>> them to be today.
>>
Somehow, I'm glad the scientific establishment doesn't have the authority
to 
imprison / torture people for scientific herassy.

What is that I hear?  Is it a body or two (or three) rolling over in their

famous tombs?

Can't help feeling like I've somehow slipped backwards in time a few
hundred 
years,
Dudley

66 Posts in Topic:

Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-19 14:41:22

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"nappy" <n@[

2008-02-19 14:46:58

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

dlzc <dlzc1@[EMAIL PRO

2008-02-19 15:24:23

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Pudentame <no.one@[EMA

2008-02-19 22:56:55

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-19 15:43:11

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-19 22:05:18

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com

2008-02-20 06:04:57

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-20 12:27:25

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"David McCall"

2008-02-20 21:53:44

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-20 16:56:15

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"SteveB" <me

2008-02-20 20:17:23

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com

2008-02-20 20:28:28

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-21 21:42:26

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-22 07:12:33

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-21 23:32:13

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Rick Merrill <rick0.me

2008-02-22 11:21:39

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"SteveB" <me

2008-02-22 09:54:18

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-22 20:03:15

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"SteveB" <me

2008-02-22 15:48:32

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Pudentame <no.one@[EMA

2008-02-22 17:46:10

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Rick Merrill <rick0.me

2008-02-23 11:34:23

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-22 19:18:03

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Larry in AZ <usenet2@[

2008-02-19 23:51:09

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Androcles" <

2008-02-19 23:55:14

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

TRoss <tross003@[EMAIL

2008-02-19 18:14:47

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Larry L [in Honolul

2008-02-20 01:35:57

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"David McCall"

2008-02-20 01:45:19

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-19 22:12:41

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-19 18:54:43

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

ushere <removethis.les

2008-02-20 03:22:02

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Larry in AZ <usenet2@[

2008-02-20 09:42:34

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"SteveB" <mo

2008-02-19 19:52:01

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Ken Hart" <

2008-02-20 00:04:57

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 07:30:31

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Blinky the Shark <no.s

2008-02-19 23:55:25

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"SteveB" <mo

2008-02-20 09:53:15

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Ken Hart" <

2008-02-20 12:16:16

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT

2008-02-20 12:21:07

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Anon" <abus

2008-02-20 22:46:58

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 23:11:44

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Anon" <abus

2008-02-21 00:03:02

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Ken Hart" <

2008-02-20 20:04:07

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Ken Hart" <

2008-02-20 19:58:42

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Pudentame <no.one@[EMA

2008-02-19 22:53:00

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Larry in AZ <usenet2@[

2008-02-20 09:48:48

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Bill <trash@[EMAIL PRO

2008-02-20 12:04:31

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 20:18:37

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-20 12:46:44

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Rita Berkowitz"

2008-02-20 15:58:36

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 21:19:21

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-20 13:29:10

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 22:15:50

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"William Graham"

2008-02-20 16:35:58

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Pudentame <no.one@[EMA

2008-02-20 20:29:40

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Pudentame <no.one@[EMA

2008-02-20 20:26:28

Re: UFO Photography and Videography (was: from a skeptic)

"William Graham"

2008-02-19 22:09:39

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 07:52:03

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Martin Heffels <goofie

2008-02-20 15:19:00

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-20 08:44:03

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-20 08:55:40

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"Dudley Hanks"

2008-02-20 20:08:25

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Marvin <physchem@[EMAI

2008-02-20 19:02:16

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

"john bates" &l

2008-02-21 19:16:04

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-20 21:04:38

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

Doc <docsavage20@[EMAI

2008-02-20 21:09:10

Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of tak

dlzc <dlzc1@[EMAIL PRO

2008-02-26 11:49:51

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Fri Aug 29 21:43:04 CDT 2008.