Re: Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking

Dear Doc:

On Feb 19, 3:41=A0pm, Doc <docsavag...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
=2E..
> I'm wondering why it is, in all the incidents of "UFO"
> sightings, including some that have made the news,
> any images that aren't obvious hoaxes (and many
> that are) are always grainy, shaky, indistinct blobs
> blurs, pinpoint lights etc.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/02/22/spy.satellite.ap/index.html#cnnSTCT=
ext
=2E.. select the second picture.

This was an event they knew was coming, could put all sorts of
resources into do***enting, and was only x2 to x5 further away than
some the "effects" you complain about (and "straight" out of the
atmosphere).

Not to restart a fire here...

David A. Smith