by "Zimmy" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 4, 2008 at 04:16 PM
"James Varty" <jvartyNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:8TXyj.28950$oW4.21761@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Just wondered if anyone could recommend a digital camera which also has
> very good video capture capabilities (or visa versa)? I was just about
to
> purchase a digital camcorder when our digital camera broke. Having
> something that can do both jobs would therefore be ideal. Don't want to
> spend more than £300. Would a very small camcorder that takes good
stills
> be the best way forward?
>
> Any pointers appreciated
>
Although many still cameras can take good quality video, the sound quality
isn't always great, you get a lot of wind and 'finger' noise and zooming
may
be noisy or may even be disabled. They generally don't work well in low
light either. You'll also need quite a few high capacity memory cards.
The still resolution is normally limited in video cameras, so you takes
your
choice.
Z
