Re: Still playing with HDR

"Pudentame" <no.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47cf2f0c$0$6121$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pete D wrote:
>> "The One" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:47ceb65b_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>
>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>> And foreground interest.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters
instead 
>>> or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>
>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>
>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>>
>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a 
>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something

>> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>
> They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox.

True of course but I do think that some shooters go just a little
overboard 
for my taste.