"Robert Coe" <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:kt55t31o8215aia2dvu7f6s0prigdmj8a9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:32:25 -0000, "The One" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : "jai" <adwani_oist143@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> :
>
news:fae7e15f-e777-4f9a-8966-cdf2a3d7adbe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > Wedding Photography Captures the Essence of Your Wedding.
> : > It is the most im****tant category of photography, as every movement
of
> : > wedding ceremony is im****tant.
> : > Wheather u are a professional wedding photographer or u planning for
> : > wedding,Your ultimate idea is just to get best result.For this you
> : > need to learn about wedding photography.the tips,the techniques,
> : > proper equipments etc
> : > visit this link,you'll get all in just one place-get wedding
> : > photography
> : > ebooks-
> : > http://www.digitalphotographywiz.com/weddingphotography.html
> : > wish u all the best.....
> :
> : Wedding photography has become the biggest pile of crap since the
> advance of
> : digital. Wherest someone pays big buck for taking a photo, when
someone
> else
> : is hanging off the shoulder taking the same shot for free, doesn't
make
> the
> : cost worthwhile.
> :
> : This is why i'd never pay a wedding photographer more than the cost of
> an
> : album.
>
> The assumption underlying that assertion is that the "someone else ...
> hanging
> off the shoulder taking the same shot for free" will do about as good a
> job as
> the professional photographer. Do you have any evidence that that
> assumption
> is true? In my experience it usually isn't.
>
> Bob
This is no assumption.
Practically every wedding I have had the priviledge of going to I have
seen
the professional eclipsed by amature users, of course by the bride and
grooms admittal.
I take it you enforce a camera ban when you take wedding shots.
I wouldn't pay wedding pros a pittance.
|
