On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:54:51 -0000, "The One" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:
: "Robert Coe" <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
: news:kt55t31o8215aia2dvu7f6s0prigdmj8a9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:32:25 -0000, "The One" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
: > : "jai" <adwani_oist143@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
: > :
: >
news:fae7e15f-e777-4f9a-8966-cdf2a3d7adbe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > Wedding Photography Captures the Essence of Your Wedding.
: > : > It is the most im****tant category of photography, as every
movement of
: > : > wedding ceremony is im****tant.
: > : > Wheather u are a professional wedding photographer or u planning
for
: > : > wedding,Your ultimate idea is just to get best result.For this you
: > : > need to learn about wedding photography.the tips,the techniques,
: > : > proper equipments etc
: > : > visit this link,you'll get all in just one place-get wedding
: > : > photography
: > : > ebooks-
: > : > http://www.digitalphotographywiz.com/weddingphotography.html
: > : > wish u all the best.....
: > :
: > : Wedding photography has become the biggest pile of crap since the
: > advance of
: > : digital. Wherest someone pays big buck for taking a photo, when
someone
: > else
: > : is hanging off the shoulder taking the same shot for free, doesn't
make
: > the
: > : cost worthwhile.
: > :
: > : This is why i'd never pay a wedding photographer more than the cost
of
: > an
: > : album.
: >
: > The assumption underlying that assertion is that the "someone else ...
: > hanging
: > off the shoulder taking the same shot for free" will do about as good
a
: > job as
: > the professional photographer. Do you have any evidence that that
: > assumption
: > is true? In my experience it usually isn't.
: >
: > Bob
:
: This is no assumption.
:
: Practically every wedding I have had the priviledge of going to I have
seen
: the professional eclipsed by amature users, of course by the bride and
: grooms admittal.
I'm not sure "admittal" is a cromulent word, but we'll let that pass. I
assume
you mean that the b&g thought your pictures were as good as those of the
pro
they hired. Either you're unusually good, or they should have found a
better
pro.
: I take it you enforce a camera ban when you take wedding shots.
Who, me? I'm not a professional photographer. I've taken a few decent
pictures
at weddings, but I know my limitations. (One of them is that I don't make
a
pest of myself and get in the way of the pro who's being paid to do***ent
the
event.)
: I wouldn't pay wedding pros a pittance.
Neither would I. You get what you pay for.
Bob
|
