Re: Has anyone gone from film to digital and back to film? If so why?

On 2008-03-11 15:01:00 -0400, "Sinner" <sinner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> 
> "jime" <jimeiffe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:nfmdnX-2gJNQTkvanZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Has anyone gone from film to digital and back to film? If so why?
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> 
> 
> What format film?  The only real advantages digital holds over film, is
its
> relative inexpensiveness, and its convenience.  All other things, camera
and
> lens quality, being equal, fill will always provide the sharper image. 
I
> don't think sensors will ever achieve the density levels of film
emulsion.

Thank you sinner. I agree with you. But we will now have to face 736 
posts about "sharpness." Any attempt to explain the information storage 
of film vs "megapixels" will fall on deaf ears.
-- 
Michael