Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Whatever ha...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 59 of 59 Topic 11357 of 12078
Post > Topic >>

Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?

by Pudentame <no.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 11, 2008 at 08:18 PM

aniramca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Mar 11, 12:14 pm, "Jeremy" <jer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Dudley Hanks" <hanks.dud...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> news:nWCAj.74916$w57.63673@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Back in the '60s, '70s and even into the '80s Pentax was right up
there
>>> with Canon and Nikon.  But, today, it seems like the company doesn't
even
>>> get honourable mention in the brand wars.  What happened?
>> They did what most of the other camera manufacturers did--they began
sucking
>> the build quality out of their bodies and lenses.  At least Nikon
maintained
>> a high-end line for professionals.  Pentax lost it whan they
discontinued
>> the LX without first creating a replacement model.
>>
>> When I compare the build quality of my "A" lenses to my SMC Takumars, I
just
>> shake my head in disbelief.  The Spotmatic-F and the ES-II were the
high
>> water marks for Pentax.  Once they migrated to the K Mount, things went
>> downhill.  I have a P3n and a P30t which I use as my knockaround
cameras.
>> They are made in China, they are so light that they feel like they're
just
>> made of air, but they take good photos.  Trouble is, they feel like
toys,
>> relative to my older Pentax gear.
>>
>> Many (most?) of today's photographers don't remember what was out there
in
>> the early 70s, and thus do not know what they are missing.
>>
>> I would argue that--for advanced amateurs especially--cameras and
lenses
>> need to provide some tactile gratification in addition to just
recording
>> images.  If they feel like toys, the brand will be perceived as another
>> also-ran.
>>
>> Now, with Pentax mass-producing digital ameras in Vietnam, the problem
will
>> only become worse.  Cameras are becoming commodities rather than
specialized
>> optical tools.  Robotic assembly lines stamp them out as though they
were
>> cookie cutters.
>>
>> Remember when audiophiles spent thousands on top-notch turntables and
>> cartridges, in order to get that high end sound?  Now a cheap CD
Walkman can
>> outperform many of those old analog setups--and audiophile sound is
>> available to Everyman, at low prices.  I suspect that consumer/advanced
>> amateur gear is headed in the same direction.  Cheap, disposable &
plastic .
>> . .
> 
> Did Pentax almost go under last year? If I am not mistaken, Hoya (the
> makers of filter lens) planned to buy Pentax in 2006/2007. But I heard
> that the deal did not fall through. Can someone confirm?

Hoya bought Pentax.

> 
> I saw an early development for a 6x4.5 format for digital Pentax
> camera a few years ago (was it in Photokina?), but I don't know if
> that was going anywhere either.
> 

AFAIK, they were almost ready to bring it to market. Had gone so far as 
to give a tentative "date" of spring 2007.

Then Hoya bought Pentax.

The 645D "on hold"/cancellation announcement followed rapidly on the 
Hoya takeover.

It's still not clear if the project is completely dead, or just on an 
extended hiatus. I lean toward the former, and hope for the latter.

> However, when I look around on opinions on the camera websites, people
> who own/buy a Pentax digital cameras appear to like their camera.
> Either the popular 2 leading camera makers are too over-rated, or
> Pentax enthusiasts do not want to tell anybody that they have problems
> with their cameras.
> 

Pentax gives you a lot of bang for your buck.

The K10D matches up pretty good against the Nikon D200 ... doesn't have 
quite the continuous shooting speed & buffer size, but does give you 
image stabilization in the camera so you can (mostly) use your existing 
Pentax lenses.

Pentax doesn't get a lot of second level sup****t. Tamron, Tokina, & 
Sigma make some good lenses for Nikon & Canon - even for Sony and 
Olympus, that just aren't available in Pentax mount.

Pentax doesn't really have a "PRO"-level DSLR, but you can do just about 
anything Nikon's non-"PRO" cameras will let you do. And Pentax's 
currently available selection of lenses leaves a lot to be desired (in 
my opinion - YMMV).

Can't speak about Canon, since the canonista's attitude turned me off & 
I haven't looked at anything since the A1. And I ain't goin' to, so save 
your breath.

I currently *USE* the following Pentax cameras - K1000, LX, PZ1P, 
*ist-D, K10D.

> In the old days, I still remember the famous Asahi Pentax Spotmatix
> SLR, as well as the Pentax 6x7 camera. I hope that the company is
> making a come back with their K10D, and K20D models.
> 

The K10D is an excellent camera. The K20D looks to be a significant 
improvement on an already great camera.
 




 59 Posts in Topic:
Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-03-08 20:46:11 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
sally <sally@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-08 21:11:24 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Peter Chant <REMpeteOV  2008-03-09 16:16:35 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
nospam <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-03-08 13:26:03 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-03-09 07:42:37 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
=?iso-8859-1?Q?The_Dave=A  2008-03-09 05:44:55 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"David J. Littleboy&  2008-03-09 15:45:54 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-03-09 17:39:20 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Jaakko Lintula <crwl@[  2008-03-09 11:14:59 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-09 17:58:27 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
nospam <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-03-09 15:15:43 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"David J. Littleboy&  2008-03-10 10:39:45 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-10 12:47:10 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
John McWilliams <jpmcw  2008-03-13 07:59:03 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-03-14 09:25:45 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
John McWilliams <jpmcw  2008-03-14 10:56:46 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Tony Polson <docnews20  2008-03-10 11:13:46 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Michael Benveniste&  2008-03-10 08:50:30 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Tony Polson <docnews20  2008-03-10 13:06:02 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-10 12:50:41 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Sinner" <si  2008-03-10 13:21:37 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Tony Polson <docnews20  2008-03-10 20:44:22 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-10 22:29:17 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Tony Polson <docnews20  2008-03-11 16:04:09 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Michael Benveniste <mh  2008-03-11 10:37:22 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Tony Polson <docnews20  2008-03-11 20:15:36 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-03-10 05:22:15 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-10 17:13:10 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Ryan Robbins"   2008-03-15 08:30:34 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
van dark <van.dark@[EM  2008-03-15 11:41:27 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
rfischer@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-15 15:57:34 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"David J. Littleboy&  2008-03-16 01:05:31 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Paul J Gans <gans@[EMA  2008-03-15 16:48:59 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-15 12:02:09 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-15 20:15:19 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-08 17:37:28 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
nospam <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-03-08 15:15:01 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-03-09 10:55:49 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Sander <gvr@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 11:22:29 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Pete D" <no  2008-03-10 06:41:13 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-03-09 01:19:14 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
George Kerby <ghost_to  2008-03-08 18:32:25 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-03-09 01:13:12 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Happy Traveler"  2008-03-08 20:07:59 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-03-09 04:12:13 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Pete D" <no  2008-03-09 19:26:06 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-09 18:04:16 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"McKev \(yay!\)"  2008-03-11 07:15:52 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Jeremy" <je  2008-03-09 16:32:04 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-03-09 21:36:32 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Clive Sinclair <clive@  2008-03-09 16:44:36 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-09 18:07:08 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Tony Polson <docnews20  2008-03-10 11:21:16 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-10 12:52:29 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Pete D" <no  2008-03-11 05:30:21 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-10 22:33:16 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
"Jeremy" <je  2008-03-11 17:14:57 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
aniramca@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-11 10:59:37 
Re: Whatever happened to Pentax?
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2008-03-11 20:18:57 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 4:53:04 CDT 2008.