On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:14:45 -0400, "Zilla"
<zilla62@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Cool effect, but it does NOT isolate the clothing, as the OP wanted.
No, it leaves the clothing on a person. That, I think, is better than
having a disembodied ****rt that is obviously on a torso. If the
intent is to isolate the clothing, then don't put in on a person.
It seems the OP wants to show the clothing as it looks on a person
without showing a recognizable person. This can be done by applying a
Gaussian blur to everything except the article of clothing, or to
apply a filter effect to everything except the article of clothing.
>"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:dd8bt3d251hh14sjv8770qg6fjei6841m3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:22:40 -0000, "Simon Davis"
>> <simondavis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>OK. I sell a few items of clothing on eBay.
>>>When I take the photo i have someone wear the item (say a jumper) and I
>>>take
>>>the photo. Then it takes me an hour or so to edit the person out, and
the
>>>background to leave just the jumper. It always looks better this way
then
>>>having it flat for the photo on the floor.
>>>My question is, is there an easy way of doing this please so I can
quickly
>>>edit the person and background and just have the selected shown.
>>>
>> I cannot imagine it taking an hour to edit the person out, but I also
>> cannot imagine doing so. The resulting disembodied jumper/sweater
>> would look strange.
>>
>> I used a recent picture of my grandson and, using the Quick Mask, made
>> everything except his ****rt and pants part of a selection. Then I
>> applied a strong Gaussian blur to the selection.
>>
>> http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f244/cooper213/model.jpg
>>
>> Total time: 6 minutes.
>>
>> It looks a little strange, but the boy wasn't posed for a fa****on
>> picture.
>>
>> I used Quick Mask, but there are a number of ways to create a
>> selection.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
>
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
|
