"Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:47d803a4$0$13891$8f2e0ebb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "natron15" <natron15@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:op.t7wvx5n9xeftdp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Digital is ok, I guess, but that means I can't use my 1000 mm telephoto
or
> a fisheye...and besides, I can't see that damn tiny dim LCD screen in
the
> sunlight, even if I do remember to bring spectacles! ...so I shoot film
> (mostly short date stuff out of the freezer) and when I'm done with a
> roll, it's off to Walmart (develop only, CD only) for USD$4 or so...a
half
> hour later, I can take the pictures home and plug them into the computer
> and abuse them at will...works for me...
>
>
> If it makes you happy, end of discussion.
> I do wonder though if you are comparing a P&SO digital to an SLR.
>
Film also had its P&S following, and some of them were SLR's. Just not
interchangeable lens SLR's.


|