JimKramer wrote:
> On Mar 13, 10:38 am, Pudentame <no....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> JimKramer wrote:
>>> On Mar 12, 11:20 pm, Pudentame <no....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> JimKramer wrote:
>>>>> A picture from my first roll of Fuji Neopan 1600 and two infrared
>>>>> images from the converted 20D;
>>>>> http://jlkramer.net/Pictures/Eno/Eno.htm
>>>>> Constructive criticism or comments always welcomed.
>>>>> Thanks for looking,
>>>>> Jim
>>>> No data since 2007-06-04.
>>>> Did they discontinue monitoring or did the water level drop below the
>>>> bottom of the gage?
>>> Pull down menu will look at the other info. Typically and
>>> unfortunately these are grant funded and when the money runs out the
>>> sampling stops...
>> Eno should have fairly stable long range funding what with the
>> association & the state park and all ... especially with all the water
>> woes (or lack-there-of woes?) downstream right now.
>>
>> I think it was something from the way the link worked, because another
>> poster found data from this week.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> What makes you think any of those people want to fund water sampling
> studies to show how badly contaminated the Eno is with farm runoff?
> As long as it is pretty that's fine, just don't get any of the water
> on you...
>
> The link was fine, there is a pull down menu to select what info you
> want to see.
The Eno Association is pretty much the reason for the parks in the first
place; and they're ...
> Dedicated to conserving and protecting the nature, culture,
> and history of the Eno River basin since 1966.
http://www.enoriver.org/eno/about/conserve.html
Can't do that without monitoring the River.
And since the Eno feeds into Falls Lake and the state Capitol's water
supply, they're kind of interested in what's going on in the river too,
if for no other reason than to figure out what they're going to have to
do to make the water fit to drink.
I didn't say there was a problem with the link;
> "something with the way the link worked"
- as it turns out, clicking on the map at number 26 takes you to the
water quality page, rather than to the stream flow page. As far as I can
tell, the water quality page only offers data through 2007-6-4. There
may be later water quality data, but I didn't see how to get to it.
|
