Re: terrorist/tourist photography

In article <pan.2008.03.14.01.52.52.212921@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
Blinky the Shark 
no.spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
> Peter wrote:
> 
> > "Blinky the Shark" <no.spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:pan.2008.03.13.20.01.38.209338@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >> A couple of years after 9/11 here in the US, a friend and I were on a
> >> road trip out east.  We were going to be in the vicinity of the first
> >> nuclear powerplant to come online in this country back in the
> >> Atomic-A-Go-Go 1950s. Geeks that we are, we wanted to do a driveby
> >> because of its tech-history content.  We stopped and took some photos
> >> (from outside the fence).  Nothing untoward resulted, but it was only
as
> >> we were leaving that we realized that we could've stirred up some
fairly
> >> unpleasant stuff without intending to; that was kind of a shared
d'oh!
> >> moment.
> > 
> > If we are talking about the same place, it was easy to get close to.
The
> > lack of security has been written about extensively and supposedly
> > remedied. I would prefer not to get into further discussion on the
> > location.
> 
> Then I'll just say that it was ****pping ****t PA and you can become mute
on
> the subject.
> 
According to Wikipedia the original plant was dismantled in 1988.  The 
entry for the nearby Beaver Valley facility helpfully gives the precise 
location and links to maps and high definition satellite images.  :-)