Re: New camera

PinkFloyd43 <pinkFloyd43@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> MC wrote:
> > "Amanda" <amanda.draper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> >
news:dedb21ef-396a-4a0b-bf11-713555862b58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Hi!  I'm looking for assistance with my new camera - it is a digital
> >> Olympus sp-55ouz, 7.1 megapixel.  I bought it to take action shots of
> >> horses - it has a 15fps burst rate which is great - but I'm having
> >> problems with the focus.  The images are not in great focus no matter
> >> what I do!  Anyone know about this camera?  I was told that it was a
> >> good choice for action photography - but so far I don't see it.
> >>
> >> Here are some photos I took:
> >>
> >> http://www.amandadraper.com/amanda/flower/quin_spines08.htm
> >>
> >> As you can see, they aren't really in focus and have a
'non-realistic'
> >> quality to them....
> > 
> > I can see what you are saying.  They look like they were taken on a
cheap 
> > digital camera or even a low pixel phone camera.  They could even be 
> > mistaken for stills from a video.  Take it back from where you got it
from 
> > as it could be faulty.  In the UK the onus is on the vendor, in the
first 
> > six months, to prove there is NOT a fault rather than the customer to
prove 
> > there is.  Maybe there is a similar where you are.
> > 
> > MC 
> > 
> > 
> Did you have your gl***** on when you looked at them? As someone who 
> shot with a 3MP for years I can tell you those don't look all that bad 
> at all!

	They are really bad even comparing with 1.xMP P&S camera.  They may look
much better than cellphone camera but not regular P&S camera.

	And the OP is dead with some memory <bg>