Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:24:00 +0000, Garry Knight <garryknight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> > : The One wrote:
> > :
> > : > You do realise that post production i.e RAW conversion will effect
the
> > : > photo quality more than actual camera quality. Are you going to
invest in
> > : > a professional RAW converter too, to benifit your photography?
> > :
> > : Don't see any good reason to do so when I'm just a dedicated
amateur. I can
> > : do RAW on my Canon S3 but I haven't found a need to do so yet. The
40D
> > : comes with a RAW converter, but I'm not sure about the 450D.
> >
> > All the EOS DSLRs come with Digital Photo Professional. It doesn't
have a lot
> > of features, but what it does do it does well. It has an unusually
easy-to-use
> > cropping tool, and you can adjust the brightness, contrast, and white
balance
> > directly (and independently), which always seems hard to do on JPEGs
or other
> > non-RAW images.
> >
> > Bob
>
> *Both* Adobe LightRoom and current latest ARC can do all the options
> available to RAW format on standard graphic formats like JPG, TIFF etc..
and
> as well as Photoshop which has been doing for quite sometime except most
of
> those options are deep in several sub-menus. Because Photoshop is photo
> retoucher not for photographer specific so it treats these options as
> additional.
I forgot to mention that I read Canon 40D comes with RAW converter that
quite afew people like it more than other like LightRoom, ARC etc.. some
mention they use it for some specific need and using other for other
need's.
I have 3 Canon DSLRs but never installed any of the bundled software to
know what came with the cameras.
|
