by Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 23, 2008 at 05:15 PM
"jimkramer" <Newsreader1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
<snip>
> > If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It is
> > more convenient and less costly.
>
> Unless the OP is shooting MF, a 6MP DSLR is going to produce equal or
better
> images then most commonly available (consumer) 35mm films. Where this
is
> not the case is very fine grained slow silver B&W print films and the
> better, i.e. more expensive, slide films. At 10-12 MP It's pretty much
a
> dead heat.
I don't pay much attention to the name to remember the name(s), but I
read
someone here comparing film to 30MP digital camera. Of course I have no
idea where s/he get the idea but it's pretty interesting to find someone
has
more knowledge than suppose to <bg>
> Jim
