by Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 24, 2008 at 05:27 AM
"Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>
> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of the
> chip,
> >> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you have?
If
> >> any?
> >
> > If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It is
> > more convenient and less costly.
>
> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good quality
digital
> has arrived.
> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and medical
> do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is advertising and one
well
> known creative director I know well tells me their photographers are
> starting to go digital. (think Hasselblad.)
Hehehe you may better hope those day-dreamers get a real job when the
interviewer asks about the difference between 35mm film vs digital camea
<bg>
