"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4sednUCeO9SVbHvanZ2dnUVZ_qrinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Peter wrote:
>
>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>>
>>
>> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of the
>> chip,
>>
>>>> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you have?
>>>> If any?
>>>
>>>
>>> If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It is
>>> more convenient and less costly.
>>
>>
>> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good quality
>> digital has arrived.
>> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and
medical
>> do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is advertising and one
well
>> known creative director I know well tells me their photographers are
>> starting to go digital. (think Hasselblad.)
>
> Yep, the world is dumbing down. Can't wait for the next digital nose
> picker.
Lotsa folk still ride a horse, others use a stick ****ft.
I see little wrong with convenience, especially when it gives me more
control
--
Peter
|
