by "Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 24, 2008 at 06:19 PM
"Joel" <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:pc0fu39anniho0ekj8ojvd49glfgbff17j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>>
>> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of the
>> chip,
>> >> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you have?
>> >> If
>> >> any?
>> >
>> > If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It
is
>> > more convenient and less costly.
>>
>> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good quality
>> digital
>> has arrived.
>> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and
medical
>> do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is advertising and one
well
>> known creative director I know well tells me their photographers are
>> starting to go digital. (think Hasselblad.)
>
> Hehehe you may better hope those day-dreamers get a real job when the
> interviewer asks about the difference between 35mm film vs digital camea
> <bg>
You mean the hiring managers aren't asking for ****tfolios?
I guess there's still hope for me.
--
Peter
