Peter wrote:
> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:4sednUCeO9SVbHvanZ2dnUVZ_qrinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Peter wrote:
>>
>>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of
>>> the chip,
>>>
>>>>> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you
>>>>> have? If any?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It
>>>> is more convenient and less costly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good quality
>>> digital has arrived.
>>> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and
>>> medical do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is advertising
>>> and one well known creative director I know well tells me their
>>> photographers are starting to go digital. (think Hasselblad.)
>>
>>
>> Yep, the world is dumbing down. Can't wait for the next digital nose
>> picker.
>
>
>
> Lotsa folk still ride a horse, others use a stick ****ft.
> I see little wrong with convenience, especially when it gives me more
> control
Can't wait till I have so much control that I don't need to get out of
bed in the morning.
>
|
