by Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 24, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Peter wrote:
> "Joel" <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:pc0fu39anniho0ekj8ojvd49glfgbff17j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> "Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of
the
>>> chip,
>>> >> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you
>>> have? >> If
>>> >> any?
>>> >
>>> > If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It
is
>>> > more convenient and less costly.
>>>
>>> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good quality
>>> digital
>>> has arrived.
>>> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and
medical
>>> do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is advertising and one
>>> well
>>> known creative director I know well tells me their photographers are
>>> starting to go digital. (think Hasselblad.)
>>
>>
>> Hehehe you may better hope those day-dreamers get a real job when the
>> interviewer asks about the difference between 35mm film vs digital
camea
>> <bg>
>
>
>
> You mean the hiring managers aren't asking for ****tfolios?
> I guess there's still hope for me.
What makes you think 'hiring managers' aren't in the same dumbed down
fix as the rest of the sheeple? Grow up on Big Macs and they are the
essence of good food when you're an adult. That's how "dumb down" works.
