Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
>
> > Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >>Vance wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mar 24, 6:59 pm, Roy Jose Lorr <ken...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Vance wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I now
> >>>>>think, see and imagine toally within the context of digital
> >>>>>production.
> >>>>
> >>>>Monkey see, monkey do.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Meaning?
> >>
> >>'Follow follow follow follow follow the yellow brick road'.
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, trying to follow the exact same technique that
> > worked for *you* with film will probably not work with digital
> > for most people.
>
> Actually, the difference between film and digital is only one minor
> manifestation of the problem.
Me? I don't have one of a most expensive cameras which I read and saw a
sample 3-5 years ago, I don't remember the exact number of pixel and
price,
or any dirty trick etc.. but I believe it's at least tens of millions of
dollars camera. The samples were incredible, but the price was a *little*
too juicy for my reach so I didn't pay much attention for small detail to
show off with other.
And it could be hundred(s) of millions of dollars, I can't remember. I
don't remember seeing the camera (?) to know how big it was, but an
article
and few samples.
I believe it was film camera, but I may be wrong.
|
