"Joel" <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2fpiu31rpjgp0kvnnc0gu5leb0ij46ofhg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Leatherman <scooter_trsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> I am new here so this may not be welcome.
>>
>> I shoot digital and film..
>>
>> I believe that the skill of getting a great shot has be sacraficed in
>> favor of manipulation. If you take a great shot to begin with, film
>> is much better. If you have a shot that needs manipulation then the
>> digital shot is better... I print only 8 x 10 and the human eye
>> cannot tell the difference in my digital and film prints, without a
>> magnifier.
>>
>> I say... to each his own
>
> May be you guy are talking about some special film and film camera or
> whatever, but my 2/3 blind eyes still can be able to see the difference
> between regular 35mm film and digital.
>
> Also, I don't pay attention to the name but I believe I saw someone here
> just lower the film quality from 30MP down to around 12MP which is a big
> drop <bg>
Hi Joel,
The only real problem is you keep saying "film" when you should be saying
"films" you know the plural of film. There are a number of different
types
and they all respond differently; oddly enough, that is what some people
like about film. :-)
Jim
|
