Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Film vs Dig...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 45 of 118 Topic 11405 of 12184
Post > Topic >>

Re: Film vs Digital

by "jimkramer" <Newsreader1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 25, 2008 at 05:20 PM

"Leatherman" <scooter_trsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:9d9iu31kr3rbrho0pv86okfvrchuikhggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:02:50 -0700 (PDT), Noons
> <wizofoz2k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 24, 8:00 am, "jimkramer" <Newsread...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Unless the OP is shooting MF, a 6MP DSLR is going to produce equal or 
>>> better
>>> images then most commonly available (consumer) 35mm films.  Where this

>>> is
>>> not the case is very fine grained slow silver B&W print films and the
>>> better, i.e. more expensive, slide films.  At 10-12 MP It's pretty
much 
>>> a
>>> dead heat.
>>
>>Yup, I'd second this.  10-12MP is the
>>best I can match very good 35mm film
>>with. That's with all care being taken
>>to achieve top quality, with both digital
>>and film cameras used, of course.
>>
>>IOW: tripods, very careful focusing,
>>shutter speed matching subject movement,
>>low ISOs, and so on.
>>
>>More normal run of the mill results
>>are around 6MP, both digital and film.
>>
>>Which is not bad at all, mind you!
>>One can get very nice 8X10s out of that
>>rez, no problems at all.
>>
>>Where digital completely exceeds film
>>with the latest crop of dslrs, is at higher
>>ISOs.  And that goes for any format.
>>
>>I'm still not convinced that digital can match
>>film in handling highlights, but miracles
>>can be worked with RAW post-processing
>>so it is not a halting problem in any way,
>>shape or format.
>>
>>Is that enough to make me drop MF film?
>>No bloody way!  And I still use my 35mm
>>rangefinder and slrs, as well as my precious
>>D80.
>>;-)
>
>
> I am new here so this may not be welcome.
>
> I shoot digital and film..
>
Blasphemy!! :-)

> I believe that the skill of getting a great shot has be sacraficed in
> favor of manipulation.  If you take a great shot to begin with, film
> is much better. If you have a shot that needs manipulation then the
> digital shot is better... I print only 8 x 10  and the human eye
> cannot tell the difference in my digital and film prints, without a
> magnifier.
>
Define manipulation please.
How do you make your prints film and digital? Process?

> I say... to each his own

More Blasphemy! :-)

I shoot both too, but I shoot a great deal more on digital.

Jim
 




 118 Posts in Topic:
Film vs Digital
"Pumper Hinkle"  2008-03-23 08:04:07 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-23 16:10:01 
Re: Film vs Digital
burt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-03-24 04:00:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Frank Arthur"   2008-03-23 12:23:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-23 12:54:55 
Re: Film vs Digital
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-03-23 11:58:26 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Frank Arthur"   2008-03-23 17:37:50 
Re: Film vs Digital
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-03-23 17:16:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 13:27:11 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-23 17:00:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-23 17:15:15 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-23 19:20:21 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 17:06:31 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-24 07:07:59 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-24 16:14:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 12:06:28 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-25 19:57:23 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 16:05:09 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-26 17:48:06 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 11:14:50 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:21:07 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 18:41:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 22:07:08 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Pumper Hinkle"  2008-03-25 21:57:54 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 04:28:12 
Re: Film vs Digital
van dark <van.dark@[EM  2008-03-26 14:40:21 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:32:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
dj_nme <dj_nme@[EMAIL   2008-03-27 11:30:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 17:01:03 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-23 19:50:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 17:08:46 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-24 18:17:37 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 15:26:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 17:58:19 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 18:43:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 05:27:30 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-24 18:19:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 15:32:11 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 20:54:24 
Re: Film vs Digital
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-03-25 06:02:50 
Re: Film vs Digital
Leatherman <scooter_tr  2008-03-25 09:25:56 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 15:56:05 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-25 17:15:12 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 05:10:54 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-25 17:20:02 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:30:23 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-23 19:41:56 
Re: Film vs Digital
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2008-03-23 18:26:13 
Re: Film vs Digital
ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-24 01:29:25 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-24 07:06:42 
Re: Film vs Digital
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 11:59:20 
Re: Film vs Digital
Robert Peirce <bob@[EM  2008-03-24 16:51:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Pumper Hinkle"  2008-03-24 11:31:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-24 19:00:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 19:59:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-24 23:10:31 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 23:36:21 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 02:32:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 03:53:26 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 09:11:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 07:35:18 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-30 12:29:26 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 13:04:58 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 23:39:00 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 03:50:01 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 09:10:35 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 07:34:25 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:02:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 18:45:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 22:37:17 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 19:51:16 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 23:01:05 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 21:05:06 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-27 04:53:19 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 22:17:31 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-28 04:23:47 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 06:08:24 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-29 09:21:07 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 06:46:47 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-31 03:03:41 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 19:51:40 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-28 16:05:24 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 12:37:18 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-29 15:43:15 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 06:53:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-27 04:02:58 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-27 06:35:09 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-28 12:46:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 12:42:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-28 18:42:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 16:31:35 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-30 19:04:03 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 16:48:48 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-04-02 09:26:01 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-04-04 01:04:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
krishnananda <not@[EMA  2008-03-28 13:54:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 12:46:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-30 20:48:25 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 23:09:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-30 15:08:49 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 16:28:35 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 20:24:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 20:27:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 22:22:17 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 20:28:27 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 22:17:11 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Zilla" <zil  2008-03-29 10:31:20 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 02:51:08 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 06:08:28 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 07:00:59 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-31 16:51:34 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 09:58:02 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 10:08:28 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 09:51:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-04-02 09:37:29 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-04-04 01:00:22 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 11:54:37 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 13:14:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 15:40:27 CST 2008.