On Mar 26, 6:26 pm, Doug Jewell <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ^Ebony-Temuchin^ wrote:
> > Do you realise who you are trying to get logic out of?
>
> > I love his "You have a contribution to make, that for sure" did he
even
> > look at the picture? This guy just posts the same HDR crap over and
over.
> > HDR doesn't below in a photography newsgroup. HDR is art not
photography
>
> How do you figure that? HDR is purely and simply a way of
> trying to overcome the dynamic range limitations of digital
> cameras. It's still photography, it just relies on a little
> more post-production than in-camera jpeg. HDR is just the
> modern equivalent of dodging and burning in the darkroom.
>
>
HDR in a seascape is piece of cake. Just shoot the skyline and below
as two different exposures (or develop one frame two ways) and blend
them together). No trickery that hasn't been done to death in a
darkroom. I did this with Cibachrome in the "good old days". Now if I
do it with a computer program it's all of a sudden some sort of black
magic? I don't think so.
