"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Ibadnb_q--nht3XanZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Peter wrote:
>
>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:4sednUCeO9SVbHvanZ2dnUVZ_qrinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Peter wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of
the
>>>> chip,
>>>>
>>>>>> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you
have?
>>>>>> If any?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital. It
is
>>>>> more convenient and less costly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good quality
>>>> digital has arrived.
>>>> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and
>>>> medical do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is advertising
>>>> and one well known creative director I know well tells me their
>>>> photographers are starting to go digital. (think Hasselblad.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, the world is dumbing down. Can't wait for the next digital nose
>>> picker.
>>
>>
>>
>> Lotsa folk still ride a horse, others use a stick ****ft.
>> I see little wrong with convenience, especially when it gives me more
>> control
>
> Can't wait till I have so much control that I don't need to get out of
bed
> in the morning.
>>
I'd settle for enough control that I can sleep through the night.
--
Peter
|
