by "Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 26, 2008 at 06:02 PM
"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:GZ6dnc2ibOv0kHTanZ2dnUVZ_oqhnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joel wrote:
>
>> And it could be hundred(s) of millions of dollars, I can't remember. I
>> don't remember seeing the camera (?) to know how big it was, but an
>> article
>> and few samples. I believe it was film camera, but I may be wrong.
>
> The problem is not with the technology but in the way approach has
> deteriorated.
Are you complaining that once we're free of the tyranny of the expense of
film, some of us are becoming more experimental in our work?
--
Peter
