Peter wrote:
> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Ibadnb_q--nht3XanZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Peter wrote:
>>
>>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:4sednUCeO9SVbHvanZ2dnUVZ_qrinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> Peter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jsidnXW_BM6HIHvanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pumper Hinkle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>> So, For those of you who have abandoned film in favor of
>>>>> the chip,
>>>>>
>>>>>>> and have gotten rid of their film cameras, what regrets do you
>>>>>>> have? If any?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If quality of image is not a consideration go strictly digital.
>>>>>> It is more convenient and less costly.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am hoping not to get into a religious war, but IMNVHO good
>>>>> quality digital has arrived.
>>>>> Digital is now being used by many professional photo artists and
>>>>> medical do***entators. The only dinosaur area left is is
>>>>> advertising and one well known creative director I know well tells
>>>>> me their photographers are starting to go digital. (think
Hasselblad.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep, the world is dumbing down. Can't wait for the next digital
>>>> nose picker.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lotsa folk still ride a horse, others use a stick ****ft.
>>> I see little wrong with convenience, especially when it gives me more
>>> control
>>
>>
>> Can't wait till I have so much control that I don't need to get out of
>> bed in the morning.
>>
>>>
>
>
> I'd settle for enough control that I can sleep through the night.
Digital diapers to the rescue.
|
