by Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 26, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Peter wrote:
> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:GZ6dnc2ibOv0kHTanZ2dnUVZ_oqhnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Joel wrote:
>>
>
>>> And it could be hundred(s) of millions of dollars, I can't remember.
I
>>> don't remember seeing the camera (?) to know how big it was, but an
>>> article
>>> and few samples. I believe it was film camera, but I may be wrong.
>>
>>
>> The problem is not with the technology but in the way approach has
>> deteriorated.
>
>
>
> Are you complaining that once we're free of the tyranny of the expense
> of film, some of us are becoming more experimental in our work?
No. I'm saying that gimmick has replaced experiment.
