Marvin wrote:
> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>
>> Marvin wrote:
>>
>>> Rob Morley wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <c5CdnT6ad5xvgXbanZ2dnUVZ_u2mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Roy Jose
>>>> Lorr kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>>>
>>>>> All of life is a constant attempt to manipulate environment. When
>>>>> manipulation is the primary means to an artistic visual
>>>>> representation of inner spirit, which all art must be, the end
>>>>> result is outright lie which nowadays comes out as soulless cartoon
>>>>> fantasy. The reason photography is less than art is that what it
>>>>> depicts is experienced second hand, its creator cannot see to
>>>>> engage the subject with the spirit, the tool stands in the way.
>>>>> Thus, gimmick substitutes not only for experiment but for true
>>>>> emotion and spiritual connection, not only in the perpetrator of
>>>>> the artifact but in those who view the travesty as well.
>>>>>
>>>> What an utter load of bollocks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's "art-speak".
>>
>>
>> Whatever its called, it invites serious refutation rather than mere
>> discomforted grunts.
>
>
> So refute it.
Refute my own assertion?
Your frequent postings seem to have no point to them.
I doubt I've posted to this ng more than a dozen times, 98% of those
posts exclusive to this thread. If that seems like "frequent" posting
to you... well...


|