Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Film vs Dig...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 62 of 118 Topic 11405 of 12184
Post > Topic >>

Re: Film vs Digital

by Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 30, 2008 at 12:29 PM

On Mar 30, 5:53=A0am, Roy Jose Lorr <ken...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Marvin wrote:
> > Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>
> >> Marvin wrote:
>
> >>> Rob Morley wrote:
>
> >>>> In article <c5CdnT6ad5xvgXbanZ2dnUVZ_u2mn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Roy Jose
> >>>> Lorr ken...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
> >>>>> All of life is a constant attempt to manipulate environment.
=A0When=

> >>>>> manipulation is the primary means to an artistic visual
> >>>>> representation of inner spirit, which all art must be, the end
> >>>>> result is outright lie which nowadays comes out as soulless
cartoon
> >>>>> fantasy. =A0The reason photography =A0is less than art is that
what =
it
> >>>>> depicts is experienced second hand, its creator cannot see to
> >>>>> engage the subject with the spirit, the tool stands in the way.
=A0
> >>>>> Thus, gimmick substitutes not only for experiment but for true
> >>>>> emotion and spiritual connection, not only in the perpetrator of
> >>>>> the artifact but in those who view the travesty as well.
>
> >>>> What an utter load of bollocks.
>
> >>> It's "art-speak".
>
> >> Whatever its called, it invites serious refutation rather than mere
> >> discomforted grunts.
>
> > So refute it.
>
> Refute my own assertion?
>
> =A0 =A0Your frequent postings seem to have no point to them.
>
> I doubt I've posted to this ng more than a dozen times, 98% of those
> posts exclusive to this thread. =A0If that seems like "frequent" posting
> to you... well...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Actually, you have posted to this NG approaching 70 time with the
salience, clarity and incisive intellectual construction demonstrated
in your posts to other groups.

The percentage of posts to this thread is somewhat less than you
estimate.

In spite of how clear everything is about you statements, there is one
linguistic token that is ambigous.  Is your use of 'manipulation' a
label for an act intentionally carried out on the environmnet in order
to effect a desired change in the in the state of affairs of the
actors environment, or would you include the unintended consequences
of such an act as part of the manipulation?
 




 118 Posts in Topic:
Film vs Digital
"Pumper Hinkle"  2008-03-23 08:04:07 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-23 16:10:01 
Re: Film vs Digital
burt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-03-24 04:00:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Frank Arthur"   2008-03-23 12:23:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-23 12:54:55 
Re: Film vs Digital
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-03-23 11:58:26 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Frank Arthur"   2008-03-23 17:37:50 
Re: Film vs Digital
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-03-23 17:16:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 13:27:11 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-23 17:00:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-23 17:15:15 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-23 19:20:21 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 17:06:31 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-24 07:07:59 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-24 16:14:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 12:06:28 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-25 19:57:23 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 16:05:09 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-26 17:48:06 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 11:14:50 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:21:07 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 18:41:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 22:07:08 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Pumper Hinkle"  2008-03-25 21:57:54 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 04:28:12 
Re: Film vs Digital
van dark <van.dark@[EM  2008-03-26 14:40:21 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:32:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
dj_nme <dj_nme@[EMAIL   2008-03-27 11:30:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 17:01:03 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-23 19:50:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-23 17:08:46 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-24 18:17:37 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 15:26:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 17:58:19 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 18:43:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 05:27:30 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-24 18:19:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 15:32:11 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 20:54:24 
Re: Film vs Digital
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2008-03-25 06:02:50 
Re: Film vs Digital
Leatherman <scooter_tr  2008-03-25 09:25:56 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 15:56:05 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-25 17:15:12 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 05:10:54 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-25 17:20:02 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:30:23 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-23 19:41:56 
Re: Film vs Digital
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2008-03-23 18:26:13 
Re: Film vs Digital
ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-24 01:29:25 
Re: Film vs Digital
"jimkramer" <  2008-03-24 07:06:42 
Re: Film vs Digital
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 11:59:20 
Re: Film vs Digital
Robert Peirce <bob@[EM  2008-03-24 16:51:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Pumper Hinkle"  2008-03-24 11:31:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-24 19:00:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 19:59:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-24 23:10:31 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-24 23:36:21 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 02:32:51 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 03:53:26 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 09:11:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 07:35:18 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-30 12:29:26 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 13:04:58 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 23:39:00 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 03:50:01 
Re: Film vs Digital
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 09:10:35 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-25 07:34:25 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 18:02:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 18:45:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 22:37:17 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 19:51:16 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-26 23:01:05 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 21:05:06 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-27 04:53:19 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 22:17:31 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-28 04:23:47 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 06:08:24 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-29 09:21:07 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 06:46:47 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-31 03:03:41 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 19:51:40 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-28 16:05:24 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 12:37:18 
Re: Film vs Digital
Marvin <physchem@[EMAI  2008-03-29 15:43:15 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 06:53:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-27 04:02:58 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-27 06:35:09 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-28 12:46:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 12:42:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-28 18:42:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 16:31:35 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-03-30 19:04:03 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 16:48:48 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-04-02 09:26:01 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-04-04 01:04:32 
Re: Film vs Digital
krishnananda <not@[EMA  2008-03-28 13:54:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-28 12:46:36 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-30 20:48:25 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 23:09:39 
Re: Film vs Digital
Vance <Vance.Lear@[EMA  2008-03-30 15:08:49 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-30 16:28:35 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 20:24:44 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 20:27:04 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 22:22:17 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 20:28:27 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-26 22:17:11 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Zilla" <zil  2008-03-29 10:31:20 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 02:51:08 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 06:08:28 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 07:00:59 
Re: Film vs Digital
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-03-31 16:51:34 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 09:58:02 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 10:08:28 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 09:51:10 
Re: Film vs Digital
"Peter" <pet  2008-04-02 09:37:29 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-04-04 01:00:22 
Re: Film vs Digital
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 11:54:37 
Re: Film vs Digital
Roy Jose Lorr <kenthz@  2008-03-31 13:14:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 8:51:10 CST 2008.