OG wrote:
> "(not quite so) Fat Sam" <samandjanet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> message news:fsu745$e75$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> OG wrote:
>>> "(not quite so) Fat Sam" <samandjanet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> in message news:fslt4m$4jo$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> OG wrote:
>>>>> "Jim" <Jimdotedu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:47ec1fbb$0$6131$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Can anyone recommend a program (preferably free) for stitching
>>>>>> together Panoramas? My camera Kodak Z 1275 will do it
>>>>>> automatically for horizontal, but I'd like to get some height and
>>>>>> do vertical.
>>>>>
>>>>> Serif PanoramaPlus is simple to use and is based on the autostitch
>>>>> algorithm.
>>>>>
>>>> Autostitch is completely free, and in my experience produces great
>>>> results.
>>>> Surely there's no need to pay for an application that uses the
>>>> autistich engine, when you can get autostitch itself for free..
>>>
>>> No need perhaps, but the P+ interface is much simpler and there's no
>>> requirement to download a fresh version every few months.
>>
>> Crikey...The autostitch interface simply involves selecting the
>> folder that contains the images to be stitched, and clicking
>> "Go"...It's simpler than that?....Wow...
>
> OK if you don't miss drag and drop, and wouldn't like auto rotate of
> images before/after stitching it may be OK for you. Personally, I'm
> annoyed by the way it doesn't remember which folder you were last at,
> so you have to re-navigate to your images each time. I'm not really
> complaining, it is left deliberately clunky because users will pay
> for a more refined version. That way, the developers get their money.
Aaaah...Features I hadn't thought of, but now you mention it, they would
be
handy...
|
