On Apr 2, 1:25=A0pm, AxisOfBeagles <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Well said - the guy must just be flaming some adversary of his. Usualy
> internet crap.
>
> Question for you - are you suggesting you would prefer the subject ot
> be dead center, or applauding the composition of the photographer?
>
> For my own preference, I would argue for applying the rule of thirds to
> a single subject composition like this one (the "Swiss grid") - which
> would suggest that this photo is very well composed.
>
> On 2008-04-02 09:30:51 -0700, Draco <JPD...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 9:22=A0am, Anonymous <cri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> did a kid take
this?http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2381990267/=
>
> > Okay, what is wrong with this image? If a kid took this I would start
> > saving up for college for a photography major.
>
> > Very strong image. Not dead center. Colors are as accurate as my
> > moniter will show. Horizen seems to be level. Over all a very nice
> > image.
>
> > Show what is the point of your comment.
>
> > Not flaming. Just asking.
>
> > Draco- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
AoB,
I was trying to compliment the OP of the image with it NOT being
dead center. I must have not been as clear as I could have been. So I
do apologize for not being clearer.
I'm just wondering why the other poster has a problem with the image?
Is it to cliche'? Does it not have enough tonal range for you? Do you
need to see the feathers of the pelican to know it is a pelican?
Again, just asking to see from your opinion and view point. Not
flaming.
Draco
|
