Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Zoom and ma...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 10 Topic 11465 of 12184
Post > Topic >>

Re: Zoom and magnification relation

by Rob Morley <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 6, 2008 at 01:51 AM

In article <ft9076$tif$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ken Hart 
kwhart1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...

> I'm assuming that you made a typo when you wrote 3 comma 5, and you
meant 3 
> point 5. In which case, a 3.5-91mm zoom is a pretty big range. Are you
sure 
> that's what it says? 
> 
He's posting from Switzerland - Europeans write 1,000.50 as 1.000,50 
just to confuse the stupid English.  :-)
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Zoom and magnification relation
juky <juklingos@[EMAIL  2008-04-05 13:06:36 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
"Frank Arthur"   2008-04-05 16:39:14 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-04-08 00:21:19 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
"Ken Hart" <  2008-04-05 18:58:38 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-04-06 01:51:51 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
"Ken Hart" <  2008-04-06 02:31:21 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
juky <juklingos@[EMAIL  2008-04-06 00:26:19 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
"Frank Arthur"   2008-04-06 11:45:36 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
Alex Monro <nospamdele  2008-04-06 15:17:06 
Re: Zoom and magnification relation
MeusVita <MeusVita@[EM  2008-04-17 19:21:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 16:26:12 CST 2008.