Re: Zoom and magnification relation

"Rob Morley" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:MPG.22622b6b7d2e920598b719@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <ft9076$tif$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ken Hart
> kwhart1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
>> I'm assuming that you made a typo when you wrote 3 comma 5, and you
meant 
>> 3
>> point 5. In which case, a 3.5-91mm zoom is a pretty big range. Are you 
>> sure
>> that's what it says?
>>
> He's posting from Switzerland - Europeans write 1,000.50 as 1.000,50
> just to confuse the stupid English.  :-)

Sorry, but if he's posting from Switzerland, why didn't he write in
yodels?! 
He must be using Netscape without the Alpine add-on.