"Ken Hart" <kwhart1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:yOpLj.9646$Ug4.5648@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "SteveB" <pittmanpirate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:u9k1d5-b122.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I take 640 x 480 pictures for real estate evaluations. We use this size
>>because they go through e mails quicker.
>>
>> When I download them to my computer, and then put the mouse arrow on
>> them, they always say 640 x 480, but the kb size varies. Why is that?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>
> Depends on the way you save them files (as .jpg, .bmp, .tif, etc) and
the
> subject matter.
> For example, a picture of a brick house will have more detail to record
> than a siding covered house. Also, if the sky is solid blue there will
be
> less detail to record than if there are clouds in the sky.
> I assume you want the smallest file size for quickest file transfer.
> However, (generally speaking), the smaller the file size, the less
detail
> there will be in the picture. You may want to consider adding a sentence
> to your emails something like "Pictures have been down-sized for
quickest
> download. For more detailed pictures of this property, please contact
our
> office at (###)###-####".
>
Yes, it is a standard size we use to transfer real estate studies. They
work fine, I just noticed that although they are shot at the same
settings,
they come up later reading different when the mouse pointer goes to them.
(One is 135kb, the next 139kb, etc, etc, all varying kbs.)
Hope this explains it a little better. I do grasp the point that the
details within the picture may make one picture register at a different
number kb than the other.
Steve
|
