Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Exposure co...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 12 Topic 11485 of 11580
Post > Topic >>

Re: Exposure confusion...

by Rob Morley <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 11, 2008 at 05:12 PM

In article <z-ednTTJGrG4EWLanZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, KC 
kc12345@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
> I have a Canon S3 which does a great job setting exposure (outdoors). 
So 
> that I could take better pictures of objects, I recently purchased both
a 
> light box and a six foot wide white backdrop.  I have two 85 watt photo 
> light sources.  I tripod mount my camera.
> 
> What I want to get is a low-noise, adequately exposed image that needs 
> minimal photoshop touch up for improvement.
> 
> I am baffled that using the 85 watt lights and backdrop (or lightbox),
the 
> Canon S3 underexposes all shots and requires use of additional lighting
to 
> get proper exposure.  White backgrounds appear gray.  If I have the
camera 
> bracket exposure, the longer exposure is light enough which shows there
is 
> enough light for the camera to get a good shot, but it just isn't 
> calculating things correctly.
> 
> Because there are so many settings, I used menu/reset to reset to
factory. 
> Set the ISO to AUTO, and took photos in both P and AUTO mode.  I still
get 
> the same result.  Gray whites.
> 
> Loading an image into photoshop shows the shutter speed of 1/60 second. 
F 
> stop of 3.2 (seems high since the camera supports 2.7).  I can't tell
what 
> ISO the S3 used for the shot.
> 
> Since the Canon can adjust aperature, shutter speed and ISO, why would
it 
> constanly underexpose these images?
> 
Because it doesn't know there's a big white sheet in the picture - it 
expects everything to average out to grey.  Either give it a stop or two 
of exposure compensation (as you would with a backlit subject) or meter 
close to the subject so the camera doesn't see the backdrop.




 12 Posts in Topic:
Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 12:04:44 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-04-11 17:12:09 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 12:33:42 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-04-11 09:28:21 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 12:40:51 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-04-11 17:57:53 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 15:49:38 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-04-11 17:11:23 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 13:15:38 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-11 14:59:24 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-11 14:57:56 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-04-11 22:29:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri May 16 2:17:04 CDT 2008.