Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Exposure co...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 12 Topic 11485 of 11580
Post > Topic >>

Re: Exposure confusion...

by Paul Furman <paul-@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 11, 2008 at 09:28 AM

KC wrote:
> I have a Canon S3 which does a great job setting exposure (outdoors).  
> So that I could take better pictures of objects, I recently purchased 
> both a light box and a six foot wide white backdrop.  I have two 85 watt

> photo light sources.  I tripod mount my camera.

Manual exposure is the way to get studio tripod shots right. Check the 
histogram and adjust.

> What I want to get is a low-noise, adequately exposed image that needs 
> minimal photoshop touch up for improvement.
> 
> I am baffled that using the 85 watt lights and backdrop (or lightbox), 
> the Canon S3 underexposes all shots and requires use of additional 
> lighting to get proper exposure.  White backgrounds appear gray.  If I 
> have the camera bracket exposure, the longer exposure is light enough 
> which shows there is enough light for the camera to get a good shot, but

> it just isn't calculating things correctly.
> 
> Because there are so many settings, I used menu/reset to reset to 
> factory. Set the ISO to AUTO, and took photos in both P and AUTO mode.  
> I still get the same result.  Gray whites.
> 
> Loading an image into photoshop shows the shutter speed of 1/60 second. 

> F stop of 3.2 (seems high since the camera supports 2.7).  I can't tell 
> what ISO the S3 used for the shot.
> 
> Since the Canon can adjust aperature, shutter speed and ISO, why would 
> it constanly underexpose these images?




 12 Posts in Topic:
Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 12:04:44 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-04-11 17:12:09 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 12:33:42 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-04-11 09:28:21 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 12:40:51 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-04-11 17:57:53 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 15:49:38 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-04-11 17:11:23 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"KC" <kc1234  2008-04-11 13:15:38 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-11 14:59:24 
Re: Exposure confusion...
Joel <Joel@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-11 14:57:56 
Re: Exposure confusion...
"Dudley Hanks"   2008-04-11 22:29:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu May 15 23:57:39 CDT 2008.